Your AI Tools Shipped Code. Someone Should Check It.
A full-stack code audit, plus a working session on how to prompt and build better going forward.
I've spent 20+ years doing code reviews, audits, and technical training — including at conferences — for teams shipping real production software. Now most of what I review was written with an AI assistant. The failure patterns are different, and so is the fix.
AI Code Review That Goes Beyond the Report
I'm not here to rebuild your product from scratch. Most AI-assisted codebases don't need a rewrite — they need an experienced set of eyes to find what's actually broken, explain why, and show your team how to avoid the same mistakes next time they sit down with an AI tool.
That's the part most audits skip: augmentation, not just diagnosis. You don't just get a report — you get better at directing the tools you're already using.
How the Code Audit Process Works
Send me your repo
Grant read access or share a zip. No production access needed to get started.
I run the full audit
Architecture, security, performance, code quality, and AI integration — each graded, with file-level findings and a business-impact breakdown, not vague generalities.
You get one report and a prioritized fix list
No 40-page PDF nobody reads. One markdown report, graded and ranked by what actually matters first. See a sample report.
We walk through it together
A working session on the findings — and on how to prompt, scope, and review AI-generated code so your team catches these issues before I have to.
Is a Code Audit Right for Your Team?
It's for you if
- ✓ Most of your codebase was written with AI assistance
- ✓ You don't have a technical co-founder or CTO to sanity-check it
- ✓ You want your team to get better at using AI tools, not just a one-time fix
- ✓ You're about to raise, sell, or scale and need to know what you're standing on
It's NOT for you if
- ✗ You need a full rebuild or new feature development (that's a different engagement)
- ✗ You want someone to just tell you it's fine without looking closely
- ✗ You're not going to act on any of the findings
Need ongoing technical leadership, not a one-time audit? See fractional CTO services.